![]() ![]() It’s still a captured moment, but with just a bit more information for your viewer to hold onto. Pro: This has the effect of making your still image come to life. Not that you can’t do it without that, but there’s just a higher level of complexity to the whole thing than you first imagine. The best folks at this kind of stuff are pro photographers with studios where they can set things up just right. Most environments have a lot of moving parts, so even when you mask things out, stuff overlaps into the areas you’re trying to loop and creates some mayhem. The hardest part is just getting it to appear seamless and interesting. It holds your hand every step of the way. #CINEMAGRAPH PRO MASK NOT WORKING SOFTWARE#But the software has a very good intro video that walks you through every step of the process, of which honestly there aren’t many. If you’re a still shooter and don’t use a tripod, there’s a few new elements here for when you’re out shooting. ![]() Otherwise, you’ll have to have the application fake it with crossfade. Keep in mind when shooting that you want whatever piece you plan on having loop return back to it’s original state, if possible. The key to smooth Cinemagraphs is the smooth looping so that it feels endless. It’s a different way of looking, but just use your same instinct as a photographer, then look for the part that you can get looped in an animation within the scene. Pick your spots based on BOTH composition and for some part of the scenery that’s moving in an interesting way. You want as much still in your video as possible for the masking to work well once it’s in Cinemagraph Pro. The technique for getting this effect is actually to take a little piece of video and then, using Cinemagraph Pro, mask out all but the bits you want to keep moving. It has all the properties of a photo except there’s always some little piece of it that seems to be magically moving. This one’s been around since about 2011, so you’ve probably seen a few already. ![]() Let me hasten to say that I make no claims to being an expert maybe just an advanced beginner.Cinemagraph (GIF captured off computer screen) If I only want to affect this particular video, perhaps what I really need is SPR to scale the whole video to a smaller size, or Crop to show just a portion of the video. But again, a mask always implies that something else (another video or filter) is somehow involved. One might think that the way to get a smaller rectangle of the video showing would be to apply a mask. Let me offer a specific example - which may or may not be anything like what the OP was wanting to do. If I am trying to do something on this video alone, maybe what I actually need is another filter other than Mask Mask this file … to do what, exactly? Mask always involves something else in the mix - either showing through (or combining with, depending on the mask mode) another video (in which case you need another track), or another filter (in which case you need another filter in between the mask and the apply). IOW, it took a while for masking to make sense to me. In this case, my experience suggests that it is the concept of masking that is complicated, not the way this or other software has implemented it. I don’t understand why developers make it so complicated. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |